(I wrote a longer version of this as a comment on
@sidvee's blog, and lost it trying to log in. Don't think can recreate the entire comment, so here goes a paraphrased version.)
The other day I was part of a twitter discussion about why the minor misdemeanors of sportsmen get the most stringent scrutiny, while even the wildest acts of other celebrities do not seem to affect the barometer of public affection. Case in point: the Lance Armstrong issue. The claim is doping, and I do maintain that in a vicious world which has a so much injustice strewn around should you care to look, the breaking of a few million people's faith should not really matter all that much (it does not to, me- I think there are maybe a few billion people who have never heard of Armstrong). And there
are guys like Salman Khan who was accused of running over actual, physical people (an act that usually results in death, unlike hurt emotions), or a Sanjay Dutt (accused and convicted of worse- naivete or not), and still their movies run to full houses and nobody seems to make any noise about their histories. It is a cynical world.
I used to believe in sportsmen once, I have been chewed out and spat back in an interview for saying that if I had to look at one person for inspiration in the world, I would look at Steve Waugh (which, given my background, the interviewer thought, was a stupid choice). But I believe that when we are choosing our role models, the context plays as big as role in the choice of the person and the strength of attachment we feel towards him. So, when we are looking at an SRT play in an India/Mumbai jersey, we are not just looking at him as a sportsman, we are looking him as a manifestation of what we stand for (the belief of how the country should be, how the city should be)- sublime, resilient, able to come back from behind, able to be heroic in defeat...choose your faff. Same, I feel, would apply for sportsmen who do not play for countries, but play for clubs, or teams like footballers or F1 racers- all of these entities stand for something- we like the team, we associate values to it, and when the favored child shifts, he still carries some values attached to the team (does not have to be real, can as well be perceived).
By comparison, when I watch the white shirt tear itself of Salman's body in a Dabangg almost as if it hates being wrapped around it, I do enjoy it; but neither I, not most of us imagine being locked in a battle to death with goons on a vengeance trip in an obscure place. (The context thing applies here too, remember how AB of Zanjeer or Roti, Kapda Aur Makaan or Deewar was expected to live to higher standards- his context was closer to the real world-does that sound funny?).
And that is the long and short of it, I guess, we pick heroes based on how we attach to them, and that, in turn, is based on context. So, I would say we are doomed to gaze on those stars and pick out 'our' heroes among them for so long as we live, because we identify with them- if we didn't, we wouldn't patronize what they did. Think about it, at its crudest, cricket is just one man throwing a ball hoping to hit a stick while another hopes to hit it with another stick, and ten other guys wait to chase that ball. Not the most urgent problem facing us, is it? But we need metaphors to live, and that is as good a metaphor as any.
As far as as Karl Malone's article about the responsibility of sportsmen is concerned, in an ideal world, everyone would be like that. In the real world, we have people like Charles Berkley who don't have any obligation to 'raise our kids'. To these guys, I only have one thing to say: you had talent, but that talent did not make you famous. You could always chosen not to be famous- so top taking it as a freebie and start seeing it as a responsibility, because like it or not, people are going to look at you. (I grew up in a world where being a grown up was a responsibility- where grown ups tried to behave properly in front of kids, or at least as properly as they would expect kids to behave- where the ability to behave as you could: to live life as you could, was not a responsibility, not a privilege).
I know my idols do not have to feel the same way, but they do have the choice to. And as far as I am concerned, I will always believe, simply because not believing is far more easier, but that much uglier.
PS: Any articles I refer to are all linked to in @sidvee's post, and I am being just lazy, but you must read that post and chase the links.